MUSIC MARKETING ARTICLE

January, 2002 "NEW YEAR" ISSUE

SCREENING  AND SUBMITTING?

BY BOB DENNIS

At a large record company in the 80s,  it was common for the A&R Department to receive hundreds, or even thousands of submissions a week on cassette or CD from wanna-be recording stars.  The A&R Department is the department at a record company that is responsible for signing new recording artists and to make sure that signed artists are producing product that can sell.
The A&R department knew that they can't really expect to discover stars by listening to these tapes.  They knew that only 3% of the records fully produced and released (with tens of thousands of dollars invested) would be successful and that they would receive thousands of submissions for each act they even signed.  If all of the workers in the A&R department did nothing but listen to a few minutes of each tape received, the majority of the tapes would be left unheard. 
So what did the company do with all of these tapes?  An office worker recorded the address of the sender and sent out a form letter that started, "Thank you for your submission."  The tapes went into boxes and piles.  If someone had a few minutes during the hectic work day, they would listen to the first few seconds of the first cut of a tape before discarding it.  When they ran out of work for the new intern, tapes were reviewed.  There's a story about a record company that installed a cassette recorder in the executive restroom; they left a box of "submissions" so the executives could screen a few tapes while "sitting on the throne."
Because of scenes like this, most large record companies now won't even accept unsolicited tapes from people.  Today's large record company wants these tapes somehow screened by a professional before spending the time to properly review them.  If an entertainment attorney, an established manager, a music publishing company or an A&R executive sends a tape with a note, "Hey listen to this," the tape gets paid attention to.
About ten years ago, Michael Lascow started an "independent A&R service" called "Taxi" that professionally screened, provided feedback to the member and even submitted the tapes that were liked onto record companies.  After ten years of operation, Taxi has become an important "player" in the industry, well recognized for the quality of services that it passes onto members and provides to participating record labels.  The company provides a wealth of free industry information through their website and through monthly articles published in Recording Magazine.
A brand-new screening service, Inside Sessions was launched in October of 2001.  The service offers you a guarantee that a Universal Music Group A&R staff-person will listen to your tape or CD and, if you buy the correct package, you will receive back a critique on your submission.  Once you join, they have a structured "course" that you can study consisting of video and audio "bites" of recording stars and industry professionals giving you advice on how to go from "Demo to Deal."
How Do They Work?
You should really visit their websites to find out about them, but I have included short descriptions of my understanding, gained by my viewing of their websites.
Taxi will charge you $299 for one year of membership (or as many as three years for $599).  With this you will get unlimited submission rights to specific industry calls for submissions (but will have to pay $5 per submission).  They will either give you back a critique of your submission (if requested) or they will forward your submission onto the listed record company or (in the case of song demos) to the music publisher or record producer.  They will put on a yearly music convention where you will hear advice from hall-of-fame writers and producers.  They publish a regular, information-packed, newsletter but you can read this for no charge before you join.
Inside sessions will charge you either $69 for a basic package which gives you access to their video and audio sound bite courses and three submissions in one year without feedback or $99 for the plan that gives you ten submissions with feedback.  You also get a Cd that will allow you quality viewing of the courses (one for music production and one for publishing) without high-speed Internet access. 
Are They Worth It?
As long as you closely judge "when" you should join, they are likely to be well worth it - this goes for both services.  If you went to a studio to produce a CD to locally release and submit product to companies, you'd likely spend at least $2500 on studio fees and another $1200 on manufacturing 1000 copies to sell and to promote with.  Some of you will say that you can "record free at home," but realize that you spent thousands on your basement gear or that you don't have good enough gear to pull it off.  My point is that these membership fees are reasonable because they will help you produce a better product and sell it. 
But do realize that you need to be ready to take advantage of what these services have to offer before investing your hard-earned dollars.  Purchasing before you actually have created some music and have gotten introduced into recording it, will minimize your gain from using these types of services.  Tom Gelardi advises you to wait until "Step 3" in his article, The Right Steps On The Road To A Hit.
The Best Benefit
Probably the most important benefit that these companies can give you is written feedback on your submissions.  Every basement music maker feels that they have more talent in their little finger than....  All of their friends and their family agree.  But will others, who know nothing about you agree, and agree strong enough to buy?  It's valuable for professionals in the industry to tell you what they feel about your potential and what your weak points are. 
The second benefit you will receive is advice from top industry professionals.  But all advice is not in the areas that you need to start with or need to learn about first.  Its hard for top executives to talk to the level of a person just starting out but they do provide valuable information.  The Taxi service seems to have one-up on the timeliness of the information provided because they are publishing new articles each month, but the advice from Inside sessions seems somewhat better organized.  Most of the Taxi information is free where you will have to purchase the service with Inside Sessions.
The third benefit is a long shot in anyone's book, and something not even worth considering as a posibility at the start,  - an offer from a record company or publisher.  If this unlikely event was to occur, the more-established Taxi works with many record companies and therefore would seem to have a better chance.
Which Service Would You Recommend?
I've already answered this - both.  If I had to choose, however, I wouldn't hesitate in contacting Taxi.  I say this for several reasons.  The biggest reason is that Inside Sessions is less than four months old!  They haven't proven that they provide a valuable service yet, although it is possible that they will "try harder," being the "new kid on the block." 
A second important reason that I would put Taxi at a higher priority level is because of the unlimited submissions policy at Taxi.  The submissions feedback from the service is probably the most valuable service of these companies, in my opinion.

RETURN TO JANUARY, 2002 ARTICLE INDEX

RETURN TO REQ HOME PAGE

Copyright © 2001, by Robert Dennis, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Published in Recording Engineer's Quarterly and Alexander magazines with permission

USE OF THIS ARTICLE SUBJECT TO USER AGREEMENT